tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-587696811840434233.post483832419029706482..comments2009-09-01T22:49:09.318-04:00Jamie Wodetzkinoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-587696811840434233.post-34727093686185410122009-09-01T22:49:09.318-04:002009-09-01T22:49:09.318-04:00

Hi MAC,<br /><br />I totally agree that Word&#39;s endless layout options are, for the most part, used simply because they are there.<br /><br />And, in my experience, it&#39;s a real problem. The fact that Word makes it so easy for users to apply manual formatting results in untold hours of lost productivity.<br /><br />For example, many of our customers are lawyers who spend lots of time in

Andrew Davishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10643536116901059222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-587696811840434233.post-29237439956698305162009-08-28T05:21:25.362-04:002009-08-28T05:21:25.362-04:00

MS Word is actually quite easy to beat for ad-hoc documents. Any editor will do the trick. But what about all the lay-out options? 1) most documents really don&#39;t need them(they are only sue because they are there, not because they add any kind of value), and 2)How many ad-hoc documents are actually produced in the enterprise. What documents do not fall into a fairly well defined category like

MAChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03957062577673090902noreply@blogger.com